(1) Overall Situation
Discussion of Social Security Policies
(1) Universal Medical Insurance and Pension Programs
a. | A background for achievement was provided as the Japanese economy
and society began to recover from the postwar chaos, when the Japanese people called strongly
for the establishment of a social security system which would include all
citizens. About 30 million people were not covered by the medical insurance system, including employees of very small companies, the self-employed and farmers. This became a serious social problem because once these people became sick or injured, they often needed public assistance because of diminished income and increasing medical bills. Also, the feudalistic family and inheritance systems were reformed after the war, and this caused very different attitudes towards the support for families. Under such circumstances, farmers, self-employed people and others who did not receive pensions for employees were deeply worried about planning for old age, and they called strongly for improvements of the pension system. Thus, although the country was in a very serious situation of economy and finances, expansion of the social security system had become a vital political issue. |
b. | Various ideas were adopted in order to facilitate the process of
achieving universal medical insurance and pension programs. In terms of the medical insurance
system, the National Health Insurance which was a community-based insurance program was
expanded to cover the previously-uninsured, and workers at companies with less than
five employees were included so as not to increase the burden on extremely small employers.
In order to strengthen the National Treasury's support for the National Health Insurance,
the insurers of which are the municipalities, the proportional burden (the National Treasury's
fixed proportion of insurance financing) was supplemented by a financial adjustment system
(by which the National Treasury's support was increased preferentially to financially
weak municipalities). When this system was first implemented, the benefit ratio was limited to 50% in order to control the insurance premium burden as much as possible. Although the National Pension was based on contributions, a supplementary and provisional system with non-contributory pensions (welfare pensions) was adopted out of consideration for fatherless households, people with disabilities, and those who had already reached a certain age and did not have sufficient time to contribute. Moreover, in order to stabilize the contributory pension system and ensure that premiums would not be wasted, a lump-sum death benefit was instituted in cases of early death, and those who wished were allowed to start drawing a pension at age 60, without reaching the pensionable age of 65. |